Menu Close

Category: Sharing Good News

Sharing Good News – Salvation

This post is a continuation of thoughts and questions regarding evangelism. If you have not read my previous posts you do so HERE and HERE.

Although not directly mentioned in my initial post, I am of the opinion that our view of salvation will significantly influence why and how we share good news. The subject of salvation arose from a 2008 post, shared In part below:

Written By Jason Zahariades,  the post is related to his journey and its path to Eastern Orthodoxy .You might enjoy reading the entire post. The excerpt below relates to salvation, thus the connection my post today. Jason first describes the judicial view of salvation which is has been my prevailing belief about salvation for most of my life.

For most of my Christian life as a western Evangelical, I lived and operated under the judicial view of salvation that is common to western Christianity. In addition, I had fully embraced the reduced popular version that one hears in many witnessing opportunities. It goes something like this:

“God loves you and has created you for a wonderful purpose. However, humanity rebelled against God and therefore all people are born and live under the guilt of sin, compounded by their own disobedience. We are all guilty of breaking God’s Law and because the wages of sin is death, every human being is condemned to die. But because God loves you so much, he sent his son to die on your behalf. On the cross, Jesus took upon himself the wrath and judgment reserved for you. So if you accept Jesus’ gift simply by believing it in faith, you are forgiven of your of guilt and God now views you with Jesus’ righteousness.”

Or to reduce it further into how most western evangelicals think, salvation means we’re forgiven of all of our sins and as a result, we will go to heaven when we die. This viewpoint focuses primarily on the individual and treats salvation as an event and a commodity regardless of the actual state of one’s life.

Jason then describes salvation as he has come to understand it as a result of his theological reconstruction.

Salvation is the process of restoration to what humans were created to be. Rather than sin being the breaking of God’s Law, the root of sin is the movement from being to non-being. Sin is the distortion of our humanity, of who we are supposed to be as God’s image on earth. Rather than being truly human, sin makes us subhuman. So the problem of sin is much deadlier and sinister than mere guilt or disobedience. It is the warping, distortion and brokenness of who we are as human beings. It is the full corruption of my mind, heart, body, soul and relationships. In this light, I don’t just need to be forgiven. I need to be healed. I don’t just need assurance of admittance into heaven in the future. I need assurance that who I am in the present is being transformed out of my desperate and destructive subhuman existence and into the image and likeness of God as I was divinely intended to live.
So salvation isn’t primarily about guilt and forgiveness. It’s about brokenness and healing. It’s about delusion and illumination. It’s about distortion and transformation. It’s about death and life in the here and now. As a follower of Jesus, I truly cannot say, “I am saved.” I can only say, “I am being saved.”
Christ’s crucifixion has conquered evil, destroyed death, reconciled creation, redeemed the human nature, and released God’s forgiveness. In other words, Jesus has made God’s salvation completely available to all people. But as St Paul exhorts the Philippians, “work out your salvation with fear and trembling; for it is God who is at work in you, enabling you both to will and to work for his good pleasure.” Salvation is something that is worked out progressively with God.

(From my original post): As is usually the case, I am much clearer about where I’ve come from than where I am going. Jason’s understandings are deeper than I have delved before but they reflect a direction in which my thinking is moving. I am confident that salvation is more than just having assurance of eternal life in heaven. What we believe about salvation has profound implications on our understanding of God and our relationship with him as well as how we live out our daily lives in the Kingdom of God ..and how we share that news with the world around us.

It is not my intention to lapse into discussion about the views of salvation Jason presents, though a conversation would  be in order. What struck me, as I re-read,  was the potential implications to how and why we share good news. Each perspective has potential to shape our message. As Jason describes the western Christian view, I cclearly hear the echoes of disenchantment. His Eastern Orthodox view embraces enchantment and tickles my progressive tendencies. 

Thinking on this produces several challenges for me, and, any others so disposed:

  1. Re-examine presuppositions and understandings of salvation. ( I suggest writing them out) I understand this is no small matter, but neither is sharing good news.
  2. Submit all presuppositions and understanding to critical examination. (I encourage serious conversation with serious followers of Jesus)
  3. Upon finding any presuppositions or understanding of salvation to be incorrect or incomplete, revise the previous documentation accordingly.
  4. Determine to what extent, if any, new understandings might change why and how good news should be shared.

I do not see this as THE issue or solution to concerns regarding sharing good news. There are numerous issues related to the challenge of sharing good news in today’s culture. I increasingly resist solutions that rely on guilt to motivate and nostalgia to define methods. Modernity has made many presuppositions about how to share good news doubtful. 

In succeeding posts I will continue to raise, what I see as, underlying issues and ideas to stimulate thinking and initiate meaningful and appropriate change. 

Prayer is always welcomed.

Sharing Good News – Disenchantment

This post continues a thread started in my previous post. If you have not read it you should do so to provide context for this post. Click HERE.

This post is directed at the question in my first post “…to what extent does the prevailing cultural ethos of tolerance, acceptance, individual rights, etc restrain our engagement with unbelievers? “ Those who are familiar with my writings will recognize the subject of disenchantment (hopefully not with regret). If you are not familiar with the subject as I have engaged it and are a bit masochistic, you can read my posts HERE.

To begin with my conclusion, Our disenchanted age is a highly significant factor related to, both, the unsuccessfulness of evangelistic efforts, and the methods adopted to deliver good news. It has been, and continues to be my contention: “Living in a disenchanted age is the most significant challenge we face in seeking a relationship with God”.

To begin the discussion, some basics about disenchantment, particularly life in our disenchanted age is helpful.

The default mode for the disenchanted age is reliance on human ability/reason and scientific laws as an ultimate source for answers to the problems of modernity. Utility, efficiency and production are our preimemmant tools to achieve full potential as human beings. Inherently, disenchantment rejects the transcendent. Mystery, fantasy, spirituality, faith, divinity, magic, art, namely, enchantment, is rendered irrelevant. our existence in a disenchanted age is reduced to one dimension, removing depth and meaning and distorting the purpose of our lives. As Beck describes, “When creation is stripped of its holy, sacred and enchanted character …it becomes–material. Raw, disenchanted material. Inert stuff. Piles of particles.”

In my first post, I questioned whether our problems related to Sharing Good News were attributable to either, of what I see, as opposing camps in the discussion.

Are progressive Christians the problem? “The progressive impulse toward tolerance and inclusion, along with a post-modern stance on truth, leaves progressive Christians in an awkward position in regards to evangelism, sharing the gospel with non-believers. Evangelism smacks of judgementalism, I’m right and you are wrong. Worse, evangelism can tend toward colonialism, the history of white missionaries being sent to save dark pagan savages.” (Beck)

Could uncompromising, evangelism zealots be the problem? “ Compelled by an urgency of doom and gloom… turn or burn.. fear, fueled by “you can”t go to heaven alone”; sharing the Gospel becomes an ultimatum to the human will. Choose Christ and live or deny Christ and go to hell.

My intuitive response to those questions is to develop thoughtful answers and suggest solutions to each problem. After some pondering, It occurs to me that the only thing that path would accomplish would be to clarify in each of the parties minds’ how right they are and how wrong the other is. Since we agree(?) we are all for Sharing Good News, it would seem to be unproductive to further solidify our disagreements. Therefore, why not recognize each position reflects honest, but real differences and are equally yoked in their ineffectiveness in Sharing Good News. I am suggesting we (both parties) share another common bond, namely disenchantment.

Starting with progressive Christians, which I most closely identify with. Progressive Christian are highly susceptible to the impact of disenchantment. The preeminent values of a disenchanted culture, …individualism, …tolerance, …authenticity, …justice… fairness, et al, comprise the lens through which we read scripture and interpret how to live out our lives as Christ followers. To the extent that evangelism is perceived to require us to violate those deeply held values, we will resist. That resistance will not be overcome by force.

Speaking to evangelism zealots, which is a part of my faith heritage. I believe disenchantment is an equal opportunity disease. Evangelism zealots are not exempt from our disenchanted culture. From their disenchanted perspective, their preeminent values are …truth, …rightness, …justice,..loyalty,…obedience, et al. Similarly, these comprise the lens through which they read the Bible and interpret how to live out their lives as Christ followers. Resistance toany violation of those values is uncompromising. Additionally, their enthusiasm for evangelism will grow or wane to the extent that their perception of evangelism resonates with those values.

For each of the parties, their deeply held values come as a result of this disenchanted age. Ironically, both attribute their values to scripture. We live In the reality of human progress and the optimism of an unbounded future, all attributable to human ingenuity and science. Each party, in their own way, embrace that reality and support its achievement. I suggest that serious engagement on that point, could lead deeper understanding and has potential for transformative change.

On the other hand, there is a transcendent reality. An awareness that we exist and recognize our need for meaning and purpose which is unfulfilled in a disenchanted reality. This is our common need which can only be fulfilled in the transcendent.

As usual, I don’t have answers, but I hope the issue has been reframed in a way that will generayte serious self-examination and meaningful conversations.

Disclaimer: I fully realize I have stepped into deep waters. I do wish to quibble over minute details. I have written with my usual personal limitations. I am painting with a broad brush and I hopeful others will help fill in the gaps.

I was wrong once before.

Sharing Good News

Prompted by a current class and some one on one discussion, I’m pondering evangelism, sharing the Gospel, seeking the lost, being missional, winning the lost, et al, In this post I want to share some observations and pose some questions, which will likely require additional posts. Here we go, in no particular order:

It is my perception there is very little disagreement among most Christians that sharing our faith is important, if not mandatory, as disciples of Christ. Assuming I am correct, why then, does the subject elicit personal resistance? (I am no exception).

Very few people I know are reluctant to share good news , experiences or products in their lives. We often do so spontaneously, even to strangers on occasion. That being the case, why then, if the Gospel is really good news in our lives, don’t we share that news? ( I can feel the guilt creeping in)

I am under the impression that, generally, evangelistic efforts are not highly successful. (Please don’t ask how much one soul is worth) I do believe, in the past decade or so, there has been a resurgence of emphasis on evangelism, particularly in church plants and para-church ministries.

I wonder how much our reluctance to evangelize is related to the current polarized and divisive culture where disagreement often devolves into angry conflict? THe old adage “you don’t talk about religion and politics” has become an inviolable rule.

Similarly, to what extent does the prevailing cultural ethos of tolerance, acceptance, individual rights, etc restrain our engagement with unbelievers?

Are progressive Christians the problem? “The progressive impulse toward tolerance and inclusion, along with a post-modern stance on truth, leaves progressive Christians in an awkward position in regards to evangelism, sharing the gospel with non-believers. Evangelism smacks of judgementalism, I’m right and you are wrong. Worse, evangelism can tend toward colonialism, the history of white missionaries being sent to save dark pagan savages.” (Beck)

Could uncompromising, evangelism zealots be the problem? “ Compelled by an urgency of doom and gloom… turn or burn.. fear, fueled by “you can”t go to heaven alone”; sharing the Gospel becomes an ultimatum to the human will. Choose Christ and live or deny Christ and go to hell.

How important is our motivation for sharing the Gospel? Does it really matter why if souls are being saved?

Do church growth strategies foster the idea that evangelism is the responsibility of staff, primarily the preaching pastor?

You have probably have had other thoughts and/or questions. My list is not intended to be exhaustive. I am certain that sharing the Gospel should be a priority for all believers. I am equally sure that current efforts are not yielding abundant fruit.

What I believe is critically important is that we understand the reality we face and re-examine our theological, ecclesiastical, spiritual and culture assumptions to begin transformational change. Hopefully, this conversation can move us in that direction.

Questions and comments are welcome.